Відео

My gosh, her command of language hit me like when I first watched Christopher Hitchens in debate. Why did it take me so long to learn of Germaine Greer?

Really good conversation on how public policy can materially impact who benefits from technology progress for capital vs labor. Tech progress does not alway benefit labor. But when policy insures that the technology benefits BOTH labor and capital it is far better for the economy and for workers.

He FINALLY gets on with it after a LONG protracted preamble at 3:15 folks

my gut instinct tells me this guy is just another spoonbending crowd amazing Uri Geller.

言之有理。 西方国家应当多了解中国墨家哲学而不是儒家。I I want to point out that West often gets Wrong about China, they never read and learn Mozi (墨子）·

But where is part 2???

Quite right or the Second World War

But sadly the US wants to see a conflict

For all the Atheist saying this Short is incomplete : it'll be the same thing if you encounter 9 men coming from a baseball game... If you use the bat for physical aggression, other than the baseball ball... Well you see the point.

The west deliberately distorted everything china with the support of their medias! When China achieved its published objectives they are considered threatening n wanting to dominate the world!

This guy is a midwit.

Your podcast is a hidden gem that more people need to discover. Keep shining!

Going fast from intelligence squad to not so intelligent squad with this kind of guys

Your podcast episodes are like a breath of fresh air! I've created a highlight reel to help spread the word. What do you think?

It’s a catastrophe that we keep following the USA in economic policy despite the fact we know that Capitalism out of control is destroying society.

Mr Starmer, define 'working class' please. Your answer's important because I need to know where you think the middle class begins, ie the point at which your government will tax more. Socialists in Holyrood have used devolved income tax threshold freedoms to draw their own line on who they think are rich - where will you draw yours? The references to 'British capitalism' are interesting but miss the point. In 2024 there's no choice but to engage with and to win over global capitalism, where increasingly the real power over our daily lives is lying. Will Labour be bold enough to break this mould? Labour should work with global capital to incentivise private investment on terms that aren't loaded entirely to their advantage. Labour should reject the worst effects of globalism, which have served only to widen the UK's richest/ poorest divide and the overwhelming dominance of financial services sector, and to embrace internationalism instead. What will Labour do to curb dominance of low-quality gig economy jobs and severely control reliance on economic migrants? The doctrine of outsourcing public services to 'market forces' offshores control and removes true accountability away from politicians whom the people elected. And as the Thames Water fiasco shows, governments also have zero control over companies' future ownership at any time after outsourcing. The threats to effective regulation that come with private equity takeover of privatised companies was something that the Blair/ Brown government was warned about but kept quiet. Brexit: sold to voters on a false prospectus it might have been, BUT...it happened. A few months ago, someone in the Labour party party uttered 'make Brexit work'. So DO IT and stop remoaning.! Think hard about the various self-determination levers that the EU handed back to the UK, then use them to restore mutuality/ localism/ a sense of place, better vocational vs academic training, repatriate some jobs and technology. Making Brexit Work is almost certainly part of the solution in addressing some of the above ills. If Labour met this challenge head-on, it will surely be doing "British capitalism" a favour by opening up fairer opportunities for them as well as the people. My fear is that with the current dire state of the UK and of a governing party in meltdown, Labour will get in whatever it says pre-election; big up 'reform' but once elected stay wedded to globalist capital, giving us all pretty much more of the same but with competent leadership and without the arrogance/ scandals.

I've been binge-listening to your podcast lately, and I'm loving every minute of it. Keep up the great work!

This man is a typical white male who's ignored the damages his kind has done to other ppls! Sad case!!!

Oxford Debate. Who watched it?

Why is that debate about antisionism/antisemitism disabled? I so wanted to comment but it was disabled. What happen to freedom of speech?

The major government powers have been able to read and control human brains for at least twenty years, and someone at her level is fully aware of this.

Is that last questioner Ash Sarkar?

Fabulous inspirational conversation. Thanks. Gaye

I $mell Xenu.

Graves V. Steinbeck?

A Dennis Prager question. Dennis does fairly well until he talks religion. When he does, his mind simply stops working.

I'm an atheist so I obviously have a higher standard of ethics and morality than 99% of religious folk, but I'm not sure a world without it is better. As you need a playpen to keep a child from running into trouble, it seems religious people need that mental playpen to keep them behaving.

Gotta love the left. Minimizing what’s important and pushing progressive policies.

How true.

As i watch this conversation, i see that she is grossly misunderstood. The way that she is questioning Dr. Peterson, is intentionally conflicting and agitating. I believe she is doing this to better flesh out the core intentions, and meaning within the things He is expressing. Her approach seems genuinely curious to me, and intended to make his position as clear and raw as possible in order to make it more consumable, regardless of whether you agree with any of his positions or not.

Harvard used to be exclusive and elitist. What's wrong with it being diverse, inclusive and equitable? If a student or teacher expresses racist, homophonic or elitist views they should be argued with, mocked, shouted down, but not excluded.

This lecture resonates and is truly informative. Also I’m 60 years old and thoroughly enjoy sex. The use it or lose it is soooo true. Excellent lecture. Thank you.

The Human Ego is Musical; it grows when you Aplaud it.❤

Love this talk! Wow thanks Jonathan Haidt!

This guy just outed himself as a fascist. Never liked him before, now I like him even less.

and labours answer to the boats now starmer in 2003 took the labour party to court and got the asylum seekers rights to benefits and accommodation which they receive now ! FACT !

Unbelievable!!! The catholic church does condemned homosexuality and the homosexuals are born homosexuals!!!! Therefore, they are a result of deviant character or anything bad!!! The children that are gay should be allowed to be accepted as such! The catholic church condenes gays but does not recognize gays are gays not by a “fault “ of their own!

Nothing new here for an old timer like myself, but it's great to have these three young folk get their message out; hopefully a source of encouragement for the millions of viewers of this podcast.

Yuval harari looks like a guy that eats ass

@1:14:42 - Ms. Widdecombe: (in reply to Mr. Hitchens statement that the Church is obsessed with sex.) "No, it's critics are obsessed with sex. There's no sex in the creed, there's no sex in the Lord's Prayer, there's no sex in the liturgy... " Then why, on Earth, is there sex in the pews? In the priesthood? In the attacks of LGBTQ+? In the attacks on birth control? If this is how the Church treats things it doesn't care about then I shudder to think of how it treats biblical sins!!

Humm 🤔.

You're a clappy bunch

Stop suρρorting the ζίοηist project in ΡαΙestine

Baloney. USA's 5% of global population consume 25% of the planet so for social justice for the 50% who earn LESS THAN $5 PER DAY we need four more planets. Problem = CO2 levels doubled since industrial revolution levels' climate stability for 10,000 years. THE ONLY SOLUTION: Solution: fewer emitters, carbon sequestering. = Vegetarianism, fewer pets and people, no personal vehicles, and reforestation over an area the size of USA plus Bolivis. CORPORATE LIES push renewables and "electric vehicles" regardless of their production footprint to maintain status quo CONSUMERISM. Climate Chaos will cause increasing global food production collapse. Pledges to buy "green steel" and decarbonizing... Hydrogen... BULL SHIITE.

We desperately need fundamental change, but Labour must first win the election and they won’t want to make too many freak waves before that. I do hope they get a sufficient majority to have some radical policies. Keynesian economics were dissed by past governments over the past 40 years or so, but they still have some merit. If you invest in public services and our infrastructure (transport, social housing etc.) then, in the right circumstances, it can kick start economic growth. The ‘multiplyer factor’ may be smaller but it does still exist. However, the key problem that Keir alluded to (the belief by so many of the electorate, that our country cannot be fixed) is very depressing. We simply cannot go on as we are right now. Our roads are in an appalling state, the NHS is collapsing around our ears and councils cannot cope with the level of funding they are given. We also treat the sick and disabled dreadfully and that has to be laid firmly at the Tories - divide and rule has always been their policy.

What’s moronic about the question is the presupposition that man can exist without religion. What is clear throughout the whole of human history is that human beings are inherently religious. Even Hitchens worshipped joyfully and exuberantly!

Another Mr fix it ,! The last one got him his knighthood

DEI isn't the problem, DEI as an initiative is good. Delivery of DEI can be & has been mangled. If you are arguing that in a diverse nation, diversity is wrong, what are uou genuinejy saying? How can equality & inclusivity be inherently wrong? It comes down to force, sometimes it needs to be used (e.g. abolition of slavery or identifying & ending exploitation) but if force is akways used, you have a problem. Conservative voices and people aren't excluded from the discussion but if those people are simply screaming "DEI is bad!!!" they're not going to get very far.

Once you begin redefining democracy to suit yoir own ends it ceases to actually BE democracy. The political party system is not actually a democracy because fails the concept of REPRESENTATIVE Democracy because the Part policy bevomes more relevent than the collective will of the electorate that voted for them in the first place

I feel she is there to bloat a meaningful discussion on the topic.